By the Nordic Council of Ministers and Nordic Council on Nordic co-operation

In the period 2021–2023, the Nordic governments introduced 43 measures to compensate for and mitigate rising energy prices. A new report evaluates their impact on income distribution, the climate and the environment.

Energy and fuel prices soared in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The Nordic countries responded with a series of measures to help households and companies cope with the higher costs of electricity, heating and fuel.

A new report evaluates some of the many schemes, focusing on their impact on income distribution, the climate and the environment. It concludes that several of the measures have discouraged efficient uses of energy or had a detrimental effect on the climate and, To compound matters, they have provided only limited help to low-income households.

Missing out on win-win situations

According to the report, Nordic governments missed several opportunities to create win-win situations that would have balanced compensation and long-term benefits for the climate.

Only two initiatives, one Danish and one Norwegian, provided direct support for investments in green technology. The report also points out that the various subsidies for energy bills can have created an expectation for the future, which may mean there is less incentive to save energy and replace existing equipment with greener alternatives.

“The report clearly identifies the conflict between the objectives behind the various compensation schemes and the lack of time to draw them up,” says Magnus Cederlöf, chair of the Nordic Working Group for Environment and Economy (NME), which commissioned the report.

Cederlöf also stresses the importance of remembering that the full impact of the countries’ reactions to the energy crisis has not yet been felt and that the picture may become clear or change as more data becomes available.

“Nevertheless, we believe the report will help the governments devise more effective aid packages in future when decisions need to be made quickly and under unusual or critical circumstances,” says Cederlöf.

More information: The report was commissioned by the Nordic Working Group for Environment and Economy (NME) under the Nordic Council of Ministers for the Environment and Climate and written by a consortium led by Anthesis AB in collaboration with Menon Economics and the University of Copenhagen. Featured image credit:  ZHANG FENGSHENG | Unsplash

Small iceberg floating in ocean water under a bright sky with the Sun visible above - climate change effects (s. science, climate, Muser)
Climate Science Digest: November 27, 2024NewsScience

Climate Science Digest: November 27, 2024

Conserving nature can shield cities from floods A University of British Columbia (UBC) study reveals that conserving just five percent of watersheds, representing two percent…
Muser NewsDeskMuser NewsDeskNovember 28, 2024 Full article
Graphic news (s. climate, science, research, scientists. emission targets, floods, environment)
Environment groups lose appeal in Shell climate caseNews

Environment groups lose appeal in Shell climate case

The Hague, Netherlands | AFP - Dutch judges ruled Tuesday against an appeal by climate groups who said oil giant Shell was not doing enough…
SourceSourceNovember 12, 2024 Full article
Illustration 3d letter blocks forming the word news
TotalEnergies withdraws from two S.Africa gas fieldsNews

TotalEnergies withdraws from two S.Africa gas fields

Paris, France (AFP) - French energy giant TotalEnergies said on Monday it was withdrawing from two offshore gas fields in South Africa. The company said…
SourceSourceJuly 29, 2024 Full article