Paris, France | AFP
Any breach of what climate scientists agree is the safer limit on global warming would result in “irreversible consequences” for the planet, said a major academic study published on Wednesday.
Even temporarily exceeding 1.5 degrees Celsius before bringing temperatures back down — a scenario known as an “overshoot” — could cause sea level rises and other disastrous repercussions that might last millenia.
This “does away with the notion that overshoot delivers a similar climate outcome” to a future where more was done earlier to curb global warming, said Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, who led the study co-authored by 30 scientists.
The findings, three years in the making, are urgent, as the goal of capping global temperature rises at 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels is slipping out of reach.
Emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases must nearly halve by 2030 if the world is to reach 1.5°C — the more ambitious target enshrined in the 2015 Paris climate accord.
Currently however, they are still rising.
Some kind of overshoot of 1.5°C is increasingly being seen as inevitable by scientists and policymakers.
This new study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature, cautions against “overconfidence“ in such a scenario when the dangers are not fully appreciated.
An overshoot could trigger impacts that last hundreds if not thousands of years, or cross “tipping points” that prompt large and unrepairable changes in earth’s climate system, the scientists warn.
It could mean the thawing of permafrost and peatlands, carbon-rich landscapes that would release huge volumes of planet-heating greenhouse gases if lost.
And sea levels could rise an additional 40 centimetres (16 inches) if 1.5°C is exceeded for a century, the authors said, an existential difference for vulnerable low-level island nations.
“For most climate indicators, there are irreversible consequences due to the temporary exceedance of, for example, the 1.5 degree limit,” said Schleussner from the Austria-based International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis.
“Even if you brought temperatures back down again, the world that we are looking at is not the same as if you didn’t overshoot.”
Act now
Taken together, the world’s existing pledges for climate action would result in nearly 3°C of warming by 2100, according to the UN.
To reach 1.5°C, emissions must be at net zero by 2050, which means balancing the amount of carbon dioxide produced against the amount humanity can remove from the atmosphere via technology.
This process, known as carbon removal, would need to be massively scaled up to pull global temperatures back down in the event of an overshoot, something that is far from guaranteed.
“We cannot be confident that temperature decline after overshoot is achievable within the timescales expected today,” the authors wrote.
Schleussner said their findings reinforced “the urgency of governments acting to reduce emissions now and not later down the line, to keep peak warming as low as possible”.
“If you want to limit the climate risks in an effective manner, the race to net zero needs to be seen for what it is,” he said.
np/eab/jj
© Agence France-Presse
Journal Reference:
Schleussner, CF., Ganti, G., Lejeune, Q. et al. ‘Overconfidence in climate overshoot’, Nature 634, 366–373 (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08020-9
Article Source:
Press Release/Material by Nick Perry | AFP
Featured image: The Sleipner platform in the North Sea hosts one of the world’s largest projects for capturing and storing carbon in geological formations, a key method for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Credit: Bair175 | CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons
