Skip to main content

Stockholm, Sweden | AFP

Climate activists including Greta Thunberg said Monday they plan to refile a lawsuit against the Swedish state for alleged climate inaction, two months after the Supreme Court threw out their case.

The Supreme Court said in February the complaint filed against the state — brought by an individual, with 300 other people joining it as a class action lawsuit under the name Aurora — was inadmissible, noting the “very high requirements for individuals to have the right to bring such a claim” against a state.

But it said that “an association that meets certain requirements may have the right to bring a climate lawsuit”.

Image: Greta Thunberg (s. climate, Sweden)
Greta Thunberg speaks in front of the Reichstag, Berlin (Sept. 24, 2021). Credit: Stefan Müller | Flickr | CC BY 4.0

Aurora has therefore asked the Nacka district court where it first filed the lawsuit to reconsider it by switching the plaintiff to an association.

“If the court concludes that this is not possible, Aurora will sue the state again,” it said in a statement.

“One way or another, Aurora is continuing to bring the issue of the Swedish state’s legal obligations in the climate crisis to Swedish courts.”

The first of its kind in the Scandinavian country, Aurora’s lawsuit demanded that Sweden take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to within the limits of what is “technically and economically feasible”.

Both the Swedish Climate Policy Council and the Environmental Protection Agency have for the past year warned that the Swedish right-wing government’s policies will lead to an increase in emissions, and said the country was not on track to meet its climate goals and EU commitments.

Swedish Climate Minister Romina Pourmokhtari has said she is “not particularly worried” by the reports.

“If rich, high-emitting, resourceful powers like the Swedish state act immediately to fundamentally change our economic systems, we have a chance to get out of these planetary crises and build a sustainable and just world. We cannot let the state squander that chance,” Aurora spokeswoman Ida Edling said.

In a landmark April 2024 decision, Europe’s top rights court, the European Court of Human Rights, ruled that Switzerland was not doing enough to tackle climate change, the first country ever to be condemned by an international tribunal for not taking sufficient action to curb global warming.

In December 2019, the Dutch supreme court ordered the government to slash greenhouse gases by at least 25 percent by 2020 in another landmark case brought by an environmental group.

po/yad

© Agence France-Presse

Article Source:
Press Release/Material by AFP
Featured image credit: Freepik

New global push to merge climate and violence prevention policies for a safer futureClimateNews

New global push to merge climate and violence prevention policies for a safer future

In an effort to address two major crises simultaneously, researchers from Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health and the London School of Hygiene and…
Adrian AlexandreAdrian AlexandreNovember 12, 2024 Full article
Image: Hospital room
Research on human-centered indoor climate for health centersClimate

Research on human-centered indoor climate for health centers

By Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Credit: HumanIC project | CC0 The European scientific project HumanIC, in which Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) is…
SourceSourceJuly 18, 2024 Full article
Iceland authorises whale hunting until 2029News

Iceland authorises whale hunting until 2029

Reykjavik, Iceland | AFP - Iceland, one of only three countries still allowing whale hunting, on Thursday issued permits to two whaling companies for the…
SourceSourceDecember 6, 2024 Full article