By the Nordic Council of Ministers and Nordic Council on Nordic co-operation

In the period 2021–2023, the Nordic governments introduced 43 measures to compensate for and mitigate rising energy prices. A new report evaluates their impact on income distribution, the climate and the environment.

Energy and fuel prices soared in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The Nordic countries responded with a series of measures to help households and companies cope with the higher costs of electricity, heating and fuel.

A new report evaluates some of the many schemes, focusing on their impact on income distribution, the climate and the environment. It concludes that several of the measures have discouraged efficient uses of energy or had a detrimental effect on the climate and, To compound matters, they have provided only limited help to low-income households.

Missing out on win-win situations

According to the report, Nordic governments missed several opportunities to create win-win situations that would have balanced compensation and long-term benefits for the climate.

Only two initiatives, one Danish and one Norwegian, provided direct support for investments in green technology. The report also points out that the various subsidies for energy bills can have created an expectation for the future, which may mean there is less incentive to save energy and replace existing equipment with greener alternatives.

“The report clearly identifies the conflict between the objectives behind the various compensation schemes and the lack of time to draw them up,” says Magnus Cederlöf, chair of the Nordic Working Group for Environment and Economy (NME), which commissioned the report.

Cederlöf also stresses the importance of remembering that the full impact of the countries’ reactions to the energy crisis has not yet been felt and that the picture may become clear or change as more data becomes available.

“Nevertheless, we believe the report will help the governments devise more effective aid packages in future when decisions need to be made quickly and under unusual or critical circumstances,” says Cederlöf.

More information: The report was commissioned by the Nordic Working Group for Environment and Economy (NME) under the Nordic Council of Ministers for the Environment and Climate and written by a consortium led by Anthesis AB in collaboration with Menon Economics and the University of Copenhagen. Featured image credit:  ZHANG FENGSHENG | Unsplash

Image: Nodule Collector
Key facts on deep-sea miningNewsFacts

Key facts on deep-sea mining

Oslo, Norway | AFP What resources lie on the ocean floor?Why mine them?The environmental cost?Current state of play? Supporters see deep-sea mining as a boon…
SourceSourceApril 29, 2025 Full article
Image: Senior couple sitting on bench enjoying sunset generated by AI (s. health extreme weather events)
Older adults’ climate concerns grow after extreme weather eventsNews

Older adults’ climate concerns grow after extreme weather events

People over 50 who recently experienced an extreme weather event are far more likely to express concern about the effects of climate change on their…
SourceSourceMarch 20, 2025 Full article
Image: a polar bear
Polar bears could vanish from Canada’s Hudson Bay if temperatures rise 2CNewsClimate

Polar bears could vanish from Canada’s Hudson Bay if temperatures rise 2C

Paris, France | AFP | Muser NewsDesk An international team of scientists said Thursday that polar bears faced local extinction in Canada's Hudson Bay by…
SourceSourceJune 13, 2024 Full article